Writing a complete argument
Communication is assessed
- Logical development, precision and clarity is one of the four things the performance standard asks for — it is worth marks in its own right.
- Outstanding Scholarship additionally asks for convincing communication.
- In practice this means your answer should read as an argument, not a pile of computation.
What a complete argument contains
- Definitions. "Let be the volume in cm³ at time seconds." Undefined symbols cost marks.
- A stated method and reason. One short sentence before the algebra.
- Conditions checked. Continuity, differentiability, domain restrictions, denominators that could vanish.
- Intermediate values, labelled — not just the final number.
- A justification of the nature of a result. Finding is not finding a maximum until you have shown it is one.
- An interpretation in context, in words, at the end.
Precision that markers look for
- Keep exact values (, surds, logs) until the final line, then round once and say what you rounded to.
- Use correct notation: for a derivative of a function of , for a rate with respect to time.
- Include units wherever the context has them.
- State the domain on which your answer is valid if the context restricts it (lengths are positive, time is non-negative).
An open-topped box is made from a square sheet of card of side cm by cutting a square of side cm from each corner and folding up the sides.
Find, in terms of , the value of that maximises the volume, and justify that it is a maximum.
Answer:
Set up. After cutting corners of side , the base is a square of side and the height is . So the volume is
This is valid for , since the base side length must be positive.
Differentiate. Expanding first makes the differentiation cleaner:
Find the stationary points. Setting :
Factorising:
is rejected — it lies outside the domain and gives a box of zero base.
Justify it is a maximum. Differentiating again:
At : , which is negative for , so this stationary point is a maximum.
The volume is greatest when .
Interpretation. The optimal cut is always one sixth of the side length, whatever the size of the sheet — the answer is a fixed ratio, not a fixed length. That is why working in terms of is more informative than plugging in a number.