What the research report has to do
What the report is
- A research report, usually written over two to three weeks with resources supplied by your teacher.
- It is the only Level 2 Chemistry topic with no fixed content. What is fixed is the relationship you have to demonstrate.
The one sentence that decides the report
Research results alone are not enough.
- A report that explains the chemistry correctly and thoroughly and stops there is correct, and it stops there.
- The rest of the work is connecting that chemistry to the development of the technology.
The three verbs
| Verb | What it produces |
|---|---|
| Account | An accurate description of the chemistry involved, with names, formulae and equations |
| Explain links | Statements of the form "because the chemistry is X, the technology could or had to be Y" |
| Evaluate | A judgement — which chemical factors mattered most, what trade-offs were made, what the chemistry prevented as well as enabled |
- The test for the second verb is simple: does every major section of your report contain the word "because", connecting a chemical property to a design decision? If not, that section is still just an account.
What a "link" actually looks like
Take one chemical fact and follow it to a consequence for the technology.
-
Not a link: "Titanium dioxide is used in sunscreen. It has a high refractive index."
-
A link: "Titanium dioxide was chosen for sunscreens because it absorbs UV without being absorbed into skin, unlike organic filters — so it protects without any of the systemic exposure that made some organic filters controversial."
-
An evaluation: "The choice of titanium dioxide over organic filters traded cosmetic acceptability for safety: the same particle size that scattered UV effectively also scattered visible light, leaving a white residue that consumers rejected. The technology only became commercially viable once nanoparticle TiO2 could be manufactured, small enough to stop scattering visible light while still absorbing UV — so the chemistry of particle size, not the chemistry of UV absorption, was the limiting factor in the technology's adoption."
-
Notice the evaluation does something the link does not: it identifies which chemical factor was the bottleneck, and says why the other one was not.
Using history
- An account of the historical development counts, and the history can reach back as far as you like — some of these technologies are thousands of years old.
- History is the shortest path to links, because each stage of a technology's history is a problem that chemistry solved.
- Structure it as a chain:
- What was the problem?
- What chemical knowledge or discovery addressed it?
- What did that make possible that was not possible before?
- What new problem did the solution create?
Using chemistry vocabulary, symbols and conventions
- A chemical technology has to be written up in chemistry — names, formulae and equations — not only as a description of the process.
- Every case study should contain:
- Formulae of the key substances.
- Balanced equations for the key reactions, with state symbols.
- Correct terminology — functional group, catalyst, activation energy, oxidation, polymer, ionic, covalent.
- A report on a chemical technology with no equations in it has described what the plant does without ever saying what the chemistry is.