Solving exponential equations
What makes an equation exponential
- An exponential equation has the unknown in the power:
- There are two ways to solve one, and choosing correctly saves a great deal of work.
Method 1 — matching the bases
-
Use when both sides can be written as powers of the same number.
- Rewrite both sides with a common base.
- Equate the exponents.
- Solve the resulting equation.
-
Worked through — solve :
- Both sides are powers of 2:
- So
- Equate: , giving
-
This method gives an exact answer with no calculator, so use it whenever the bases can be matched.
-
The bases to recognise: powers of 2 (2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64), powers of 3 (3, 9, 27, 81), powers of 5 (5, 25, 125).
-
A fraction is a negative power: .
Method 2 — taking logarithms
-
Use when the bases cannot be matched, which is most real contexts.
- Isolate the exponential term so it is alone on one side.
- Take logs of both sides — any base works; or on your calculator.
- Bring the exponent down using .
- Solve the resulting linear equation.
-
Worked through — solve :
- Take logs:
- Bring down:
- Solve:
-
Note that is not . Dividing two logs is not the log of the quotient.
Isolating first
- The exponential must be alone before you take logs.
- For :
- Subtract 5:
- Divide by 3:
- Now solve: (by matching bases, since )
- Taking logs of directly achieves nothing, because there is no law for the log of a sum.
Exponents that are expressions
- The exponent often contains more than just :
- gives , so , and then solve for .
- Keep the whole exponent in brackets when you bring it down. Dropping the brackets is the standard error here.
Hidden quadratics
- An equation with two exponential terms whose exponents differ by a factor of 2 is a quadratic in disguise:
- Since , substitute :
- , so , giving or
- Then gives , and gives
- Reject any negative or zero value of , because is always strictly positive.
Checking your answer
- Substitute back. Exponential answers are often decimals, so a quick check catches sign errors and misplaced brackets.
- Sense-check the size. If , then must be between 4 and 5, since and . An answer of 66 is obviously wrong.
Worked ExampleTwo methods, and knowing which to use
Solve (a) exactly, and (b) , giving to 3 significant figures.
Part (a), Step 1 — Look for a common base
Both 9 and 27 are powers of 3:
Since the bases can be matched, this method gives an exact answer with no calculator.
Part (a), Step 2 — Rewrite both sides
Apply the power-of-a-power law, multiplying the indices. Keep the brackets so the multiplication distributes:
Part (a), Step 3 — Equate the exponents
If two powers of the same base are equal, their exponents must be equal:
Part (a), Step 4 — Solve
Part (a), Step 5 — Check
Part (b), Step 1 — Recognise that bases cannot be matched
1200, 700 and 1.045 are not powers of a common number, so logarithms are needed.
Part (b), Step 2 — Isolate the exponential
Divide both sides by 700 so the exponential stands alone:
Part (b), Step 3 — Take logs of both sides
Part (b), Step 4 — Bring the exponent down
Using :
Part (b), Step 5 — Solve for
Part (b), Step 6 — Check
Sense-check: at about 4.5% growth, a value should take roughly 16 years to double. Growing by a factor of 1.71 — less than doubling — in 12.3 years is consistent ✓