Contested perspectives · Part 3 of 3
6 exam-style questions with model answers, plus 8 quick multi-choice questions — every question on this part of the standard, grouped by the 2 pages of notes they come from.
Write a full answer before you reveal the model one. That comparison is where the learning happens.
Describe the previous/current structure AS91437 illustrates, and how you would use historians in a submission.
Explain in depth why students wrongly attribute changes in historical interpretation to the discovery of new evidence.
Comprehensively analyse the difficulty of explaining the current perspective by its own reasons, and why it is the clearest test of the "as an historian" stance.
Describe how you would plan an AS91437 submission and write the judgement it requires.
Explain in depth why the ground you choose for your judgement determines whether you can answer the objection to it.
Comprehensively analyse whether it is coherent for a standard to require judgement about perspectives while defining validity in terms of reasons rather than correctness.