Loading subjects
15 exam-style questions with model answers, plus 20 quick multi-choice questions — every question on the site for this standard, grouped by the 5 pages of notes they come from.
Write a full answer before you reveal the model one — that comparison is where the marks come from. Every block links back to the notes that teach it.
Describe what AS91229 requires you to produce, and how you would choose a topic.
Explain in depth why so many students produce an essay for this standard, and what specifically has to be different.
Comprehensively examine what it means for an inquiry to be 'comprehensive' rather than merely complete, and where the difference shows.
Explain how you would prepare an inquiry and develop focusing questions.
Explain in depth why a question that assumes its own answer damages an inquiry, using an example.
Comprehensively examine the relationship between what sources survive and what questions an inquiry can honestly ask.
Explain how you would find, select and record sources for your inquiry.
Explain in depth why the number of sources matters less than their independence, and how to judge independence.
Comprehensively examine what it means to 'select' evidence, and why selection is itself part of what is assessed.
Explain what an annotation must contain, and write one for a source of your choice.
Explain in depth why 'useful for X, not useful for Y' is a better annotation than a verdict on reliability, and what each half contributes.
Comprehensively examine what cross-referencing can and cannot establish, and how a student should handle a disagreement they cannot resolve.
Explain what an evaluation of an inquiry must contain, and what does not belong in one.
Explain in depth why a weak evaluation is usually caused by decisions made in the earlier stages, not by the evaluation itself.
Comprehensively examine why saying what an inquiry could not establish strengthens rather than weakens it.